| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Sticky:[118.7] Warp Bubble Dragging Change - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
There is nothing wrong with this tactic as stated previously. Dont do it. You will just lessen the game and help the carebears who dont know how to use simple tactics to avoid a IMMOVABLE object. That and or they lost a blingy and are crying abo...
- by Miss Everest - at 2016.07.01 20:22:42
|
2. Utility High Slot - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hopelesshobo wrote: Miss Everest wrote: [quote=Anhenka]or taken out like FoF and Fighter Assist. FOF are still in the game. See Auto Targeting Missiles. Anyways, I agree they are underwhelming, but I'm not sure how to buff them or chang...
- by Miss Everest - at 2015.04.13 03:07:10
|
3. Utility High Slot - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Anhenka wrote: I would rather have any non cloak highslot object over a defender missile. Small smarty on a BS? Ok. Salvager? Cool. Passive targeter? Might as well. Entosis link? Sov for the sov throne. Neut? Great. Missile launcher that can ...
- by Miss Everest - at 2015.04.13 01:38:41
|
4. Utility High Slot - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Defender missiles as a utility HS. Why? No one uses Defense missiles and what they are sounds more like a utility then anything else. Really? No one, if you do your lying, uses Defender missiles. Potentially they could be cool but normally no on...
- by Miss Everest - at 2015.04.13 01:06:21
|
5. Separate all 4 empires and make hauling/true piracy fun. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This isnt bad but I would rather just have Jita and systems around Jita be owned and run by Concord with links to all the empires! That would be a true tradehub... but that would never happen.
- by Miss Everest - at 2015.01.31 06:12:06
|
6. Three minor issues with a big potential impact - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Capitals, Titans and the like they can fight back sooo they wouldn't count. Also I only suggest reducing it when in freighters. But you are not wrong for the most part. Bumping can be mitigated and altered enough. Again at the minimal allowing p...
- by Miss Everest - at 2015.01.29 06:37:29
|
7. Three minor issues with a big potential impact - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Yes, you are in a Pod and in a liquid so you can survive just fine. But your crew isnt. And if its automated your drones will have a hard time as well. Something will be dislodged. And thinking of it like poles... ok but even they can be made to ...
- by Miss Everest - at 2015.01.29 05:16:32
|
8. Three minor issues with a big potential impact - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Three minor issues with a big impact. These issues are: Bumping Log off timer for people that don't/cant agress (freighters) hyperdunking (CCP ruling is stupid and you should feel bad.) First I want to make it clear I have used two of these to m...
- by Miss Everest - at 2015.01.29 02:40:14
|
9. Survey for Structures in EVE - Your opinion matters! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Am I the only one that got confused between the phrasing "Starbase" and "Outpost". Everyone I know for years has used "POS" and "Station". I mean... would it be that hard to say such? Or if you must just say "Player owned station" Because a PO...
- by Miss Everest - at 2015.01.12 17:40:55
|
10. Sticky:[Beyond Rubicon] What Mobile Structures would you like to see? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
There are 76 pages at this point so I am unsure if it has been said already but. Has anyone mentioned deploy-able Turrets? Before you go to far let me explain. This will be put onto Outposts and gates only. Essentially counter to what all oth...
- by Miss Everest - at 2014.07.16 01:41:00
|
11. Possible fix to [Defender Missile] system - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Your idea has some merit, but I think it would need more then that. Defender and FaF missles are pointless in EVE as of right now. Good idea... just pointless. It would require a major fix, more like being able to attach them like rigs... rather...
- by Miss Everest - at 2014.07.14 20:51:00
|
12. [Proposal] Rorqual Refining services - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Capt Harlock wrote: how could this drastically affect wh corps? the mobile refineries are going to take skill into affect now and give 50% or 52% base. so if a rorqual is 50% plus skill bonus, then its less than a pos mod or an outpost. i dont...
- by Miss Everest - at 2014.07.14 20:50:00
|
13. Sticky:[Kronos] Freighters and Jump Freighters Rebalance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Azami Nevinyrall wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: Good evening everyone. Just wanted to let you guys know that we haven't forgotten about you. I'm discussing a few improvements to the design with the CSM now, and we'll be able to start getting your ...
- by Miss Everest - at 2014.05.20 00:37:00
|
14. Sticky:[Kronos] Phoenix and Citadel Missiles - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I like the new Phoenix changes! It has needed them for a very long time! Also happy CCP is now looking at caps and working on them! Any thought on fixing the Thanatos and Niddhoger as well? Would only require a pretty small change to bring them ...
- by Miss Everest - at 2014.05.07 19:09:00
|
15. Sticky:[Summer 2014] Jump Drive Isotope Consumption - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
NO! CCP NO! *Gets rolled up holoreel* BAD CCP BAD!
- by Miss Everest - at 2014.04.30 04:09:00
|
16. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.x] Drone Assist change - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Am I really one of the few that don't like this?
- by Miss Everest - at 2014.02.07 00:17:00
|
17. Why freighter bumping in High Sec is an exploit - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
"Bumping" is simply a Exploit sanctioned by CCP.
- by Miss Everest - at 2014.02.06 23:33:00
|
18. Rorqual Reballance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Captain StringfellowHawk wrote: Miss Everest wrote: Cryten Jones wrote: Will there be one? It seems to me that it's never used in the way it's been designed (no evidence, just not seen it) rather a POS bound booster / compressor. I was ...
- by Miss Everest - at 2013.09.27 00:50:00
|
19. Rorqual Reballance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cryten Jones wrote: Will there be one? It seems to me that it's never used in the way it's been designed (no evidence, just not seen it) rather a POS bound booster / compressor. I was thinking something like: Remove the Clone jump shizzle G...
- by Miss Everest - at 2013.09.26 23:56:00
|
20. showing up on local has to be removed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
jujumagumboo wrote: Harry Forever wrote: yea old story, just another big alliances advantage they all have their intel channels, spam their system with alts and see who is going back and forth this awaited me after jumping into JU system j...
- by Miss Everest - at 2013.08.14 17:24:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |